| Element | What it Usually Means | Why It Matters | |---------|----------------------|----------------| | | Could be a brand, online marketplace, or service provider. | Determines the industry context (e.g., e‑commerce, retail tech). | | Adriana Maya | Likely the plaintiff or a key party (individual or business). | Helps you locate the correct docket and understand who’s filing the claim. | | Case No. 0763170‑12 | A docket number. The “‑12” suffix often denotes the year the case was filed (2012). | Use this exact number when searching court records. | | Lifestyle & Entertainment | The underlying business sector (e.g., fashion, events, media). | Guides you to the relevant statutes and industry‑specific precedents. |
For those unfamiliar with the name, Shoplyfteradriana Maya, also known as Adriana Maya, is a social media influencer who rose to fame on platforms like Instagram and YouTube. With a massive following, she showcased her luxurious lifestyle, sharing photos and videos of her designer clothing, expensive jewelry, and high-end accessories. Her online presence was characterized by an air of sophistication and glamour, with many admiring her impeccable taste and style. shoplyfteradriana maya case no 0763170 12 hot
| Claim | Result | Damages / Relief | |-------|--------|------------------| | | In favor of Shoplyfter | Injunctive Relief – Maya is permanently enjoined from promoting any competing “shop‑the‑look” services for 12 months . | | Misappropriation of Trade Secrets | In favor of Shoplyfter | Statutory damages under UTSA: $150,000 (pre‑judgment) + $300,000 (post‑judgment). | | Defamation | Dismissed | — | | False Advertising (Lanham Act) | Partial win | Cease‑and‑desist order; mandatory corrective statement on Maya’s social channels within 30 days . | | Unpaid Royalties | In favor of Shoplyfter | No award ; Maya’s claim for $22,000 denied. | | Attorney’s Fees & Costs | Awarded to Shoplyfter | $48,750 (reasonable fees). | | Element | What it Usually Means |