This is the "abolitionist" perspective. Proponents believe that animals are not property or resources, but sentient beings with inherent value.
is a science-based and pragmatic philosophy. It accepts that humans use animals for various purposes (food, medicine, entertainment, clothing) but argues that we have a moral duty to prevent unnecessary suffering and provide for their well-being. This is the "abolitionist" perspective
This is the "humane use" perspective. Proponents of welfare accept that humans may use animals for food, research, and clothing, but argue that we have a moral obligation to minimize suffering. It accepts that humans use animals for various
Animal welfare is a science-based, pragmatic framework. It accepts the premise that humans use animals for various purposes—food, research, clothing, and companionship—but argues that we have a moral obligation to minimize suffering during that use. Animal welfare is a science-based, pragmatic framework
The animal rights movement is rooted in the belief that animals are sentient beings —capable of feeling pain and experiencing emotions. Global Animal Law: What It Is and Why We Need It
: A widely accepted standard covering freedom from hunger/thirst, discomfort, pain/injury/disease, fear/distress, and freedom to express normal behavior .
The concept of animal rights, on the other hand, takes a more radical approach. It argues that animals have inherent rights, similar to those of humans, and should be treated as individuals with autonomy and dignity. Animal rights advocates argue that animals have the right to live free from exploitation, cruelty, and suffering.