Seksuele Voorlichting 1991 Here

Because it uses explicit nudity rather than illustrations, the film has been a subject of debate. Some viewers find its directness helpful for clear education, while others criticize its use of underage nudity for instructional purposes.

De redactie antwoordde vierkant: “Beste jongen, je vader heeft het fout. Een erectie kost maar heel weinig bloed. Je wordt er niet dom van. Je moeder heeft misschien gelijk over iets anders. Groetjes, het team.” seksuele voorlichting 1991

The Dutch model proved a counter-intuitive truth: Because it uses explicit nudity rather than illustrations,

Before the 1980s, sexual education in the Netherlands was fragmented. While the Dutch have historically been pragmatic about the body (think of the iconic open bathroom doors in traditional farmhouses), the educational system was largely divided along religious lines (Protestant, Catholic, and public). In the 1970s, progressive movements pushed for "relation and sexuality education," but it was not mandatory. Een erectie kost maar heel weinig bloed